Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=968436
 
 

Footnotes (283)



 


 



The Apportionment of Direct Taxes Under the Constitution


Joseph M. Dodge


Florida State University - College of Law

March 2007

FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 250

Abstract:     
Under the U.S. Constitution as amended by the Sixteenth Amendment, any federal tax that is a "direct tax" (which is not an "income tax") must be apportioned among the states in accordance with the respective populations of the various states. The purpose of this Article to solve the riddle of what is a "direct tax" that is subject to the apportionment requirement. Since the apportionment requirement can only apply inequitably across the nation, the correct labeling of any federal tax (other than an income tax) as a "direct tax" amounts to the proverbial "kiss of death," as no such tax will be enacted.

Recent commentary has staked out positions on this issue that I consider to be incorrect. Bruce Ackerman argues that that the Thirteenth Amendment (abolishing slavery) effectively repealed the apportionment-of-direct-tax clauses. Calvin Johnson argues that "direct tax" means only a tax capable (without effort) of being fairly apportioned among the states in accordance with population, namely, a capitation tax or a tax on the states (a requisition). At the other end of the spectrum, Erik Jensen argues that "direct tax" means any personal tax other than an income tax. I argue, on the basis of constitutional text, the formation of the constitution, post-ratification history, function, historical evolution, and judicial doctrine that "direct tax" encompasses only (1) capitation (head) taxes, (2) requisitions, and (3) taxes on real estate. The apportionment requirement made "political" sense in the Framing period by linking the representation of states with the taxation of states, and also appeared to serve some narrow instrumental concerns. However, the theory is skewed, mainly because states are not really taxed as states, and states (as states) are only tenuously represented in Congress. Also, although apportionment dealt with some instrumental concerns, it aggravated others. I conclude that (apart from requisitions and head taxes), apportionment makes sense only with respect to real estate taxes, which is the nearest tax to a state tax. I also conclude that a real estate tax cannot be bootstrapped into validity as an "income tax." Nevertheless, federal taxes on personal property and imputed income from real estate are constitutional, if endowment taxes are not.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 61

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 7, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Dodge, Joseph M., The Apportionment of Direct Taxes Under the Constitution (March 2007). FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 250. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=968436 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.968436

Contact Information

Joseph M. Dodge (Contact Author)
Florida State University - College of Law ( email )
425 W. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32306
United States
850-644-4590 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,931
Downloads: 176
Download Rank: 102,973
Footnotes:  283

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.234 seconds