Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=968725
 
 

Footnotes (206)



 


 



A Fundamental Right of the Monied to 'Buy Out Of' Universal Health Care Program Restrictions Versus the Moral Claim of Everyone Else to Decent Health Care: An Unremitting Paradox of Health Care Reform?


Roy G. Spece Jr.


University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law


Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 07-09
Journal of Health & Biomedical Law, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2005

Abstract:     
A consensus has emerged that we should move toward and then achieve universal health care coverage. Reaching out to the 47 million presently uninsured will require significant restrictions on care within and without a universal plan. The most direct form of limitation on wealthier individuals seeking care outside a plan - one followed in Canada, a recently vetoed California plan, and in the Clinton plan - is to prohibit supplemental insurance. This article advocates a plan that incorporates such a limitation and associated restrictions. Any such restrictions are likely to be met with constitutional objections. For example, in 2005 Canada's Supreme Court found Quebec's prohibition on supplemental insurance unconstitutional. A finding that there is a fundamental right to purchase care, such as made in a 2006 federal appeals court ruling concerning experimental treatment, augurs problems for an array of health care reforms. This article will establish that although there is a fundamental right to purchase care, it is limited to care that the government has released for general use or sale. It does not include experimental care, treatments (such as marijuana) the government subjects to criminal prohibition, or interventions that the government has determined to be otherwise inefficient or immoral (e.g., transplantation requiring purchased organs). Therefore, although a properly cabined fundamental right to purchase care can limit universal health care reform if it incorporates irrational restrictions or does not deliver what it promises, such a right does not threaten a plan even as restrictive as the one advocated here.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 99

Keywords: universal health care, fundamental rights, constitutional law, rationing, health care reform

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 7, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Spece, Roy G., A Fundamental Right of the Monied to 'Buy Out Of' Universal Health Care Program Restrictions Versus the Moral Claim of Everyone Else to Decent Health Care: An Unremitting Paradox of Health Care Reform?. Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 07-09; Journal of Health & Biomedical Law, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=968725

Contact Information

Roy G. Spece Jr. (Contact Author)
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 829
Downloads: 102
Download Rank: 149,347
Footnotes:  206

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.500 seconds