|
||||
|
||||
The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act: Means-Testing or Mean Spirited?
Adam B. Ashcraft Federal Reserve Bank of New York Astrid Andrea Dick INSEAD; Federal Reserve Bank of New York Donald P. Morgan Federal Reserve Bank of New York March 2007 FRB of New York Staff Report No. 279 Abstract: Thousands of U.S. households filed for bankruptcy just before the bankruptcy law changed in 2005. That rush-to-file was more pronounced, we find, in states with more generous bankruptcy exemptions and lower credit scores. We take that finding as evidence that the new law effectively reduces exemptions, which in turn should reduce the "demand" for bankruptcy and the resulting losses to suppliers of consumer credit. We expect the savings to suppliers will be shared with borrowers by way of lower credit card rates, although credit card spreads have not yet fallen. If cheaper credit is the upside of the new law, the downside is reduced bankruptcy "insurance" against bad luck. The overall impact of the new law on the average household depends on how one weighs those two sides.
Keywords: bankruptcy, consumption smoothing, insurance, moral hazard JEL Classifications: G33, K35 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: March 13, 2007 ; Last revised: March 18, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollob 5 in 0.438 seconds.