Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=971197
 
 

References (24)



 
 

Citations (50)



 


 



Why is PIN Priced?


Jefferson Duarte


Rice University

Lance A. Young


University of Washington - Department of Finance and Business Economics

May 18, 2007


Abstract:     
Recent empirical work suggests that a proxy for the probability of informed trading (PIN) is an important determinant of the cross-section of average returns. This paper examines whether PIN is priced because of information asymmetry or because of other liquidity effects that are unrelated to information asymmetry. Our starting point is a model that decomposes PIN into two components, one related to asymmetric information and one related to illiquidity. In a two-pass Fama-MacBeth regression, we show that the PIN component related to asymmetric information is not priced, while the PIN component related to illiquidity is priced. We conclude, therefore, that liquidity effects unrelated to information asymmetry explain the relation between PIN and the cross-section of expected returns.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: Liquidity, Information Asymmetry

JEL Classification: G12, G14

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 21, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Duarte, Jefferson and Young, Lance A., Why is PIN Priced? (May 18, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=971197 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.971197

Contact Information

Jefferson Duarte (Contact Author)
Rice University ( email )
6100 South Main Street
P.O. Box 1892
Houston, TX 77005-1892
United States
713.3486137 (Phone)
Lance A. Young
University of Washington - Department of Finance and Business Economics ( email )
Box 353200
Seattle, WA 98195
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,955
Downloads: 766
Download Rank: 11,333
References:  24
Citations:  50

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds