|
||||
|
||||
Do Households Benefit from Financial Deregulation and Innovation? The Case of the Mortgage Market
Kristopher Gerardi Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Harvey S. Rosen Princeton University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research) Paul Willen Federal Reserve Bank of Boston - Research Department; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) March 2007 NBER Working Paper No. W12967 Abstract: The U.S. mortgage market has experienced phenomenal change over the last 35 years. This paper develops and implements a technique for assessing the impact of changes in the mortgage market on households. Our framework, which is based on the permanent income hypothesis, that allows us to gauge the importance of borrowing constraints by estimating the empirical relationship between the value of a household's home purchase and its future income. We find that over the past several decades, housing markets have become less imperfect in the sense that households are now more able to buy homes whose values are consistent with their long-term income prospects. One issue that has received particular attention is the role that the housing Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, have played in improving the market for housing finance. We find no evidence that the GSEs' activities have contributed to this phenomenon. This is true whether we look at all homebuyers, or at subsamples of the population whom we might expect to benefit particularly from GSE activity, such as low-income households and first-time homebuyers. Working Paper Series Date posted: March 15, 2007 ; Last revised: April 08, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.125 seconds.