Footnotes (178)



Copyright in Exile: Restoring the Original Parameters of Exclusive Reproduction

Kenneth M. Alfano

University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

Journal of Technology Law & Policy, Vol. 11, pp. 215-258, 2006

What does it mean to copy? Modern case law too often bypasses this question, summarily deeming copies to exist wherever creative content is reused in any way, thereby imparting a broad content-activity right devoid of statutory support. While considerable debate surrounds the various defenses and exceptions to copyright protection, less attention has been paid to assessing what copyright actually covers in the first place. The affirmative scope of the reproduction right warrants careful scrutiny; it hinges upon the construction of the language Congress has employed over the years to ordain, perpetuate, and qualify it.

Almost a century ago, the U.S. Supreme Court crystallized a highly constrained definition of "copying." Early senses of the term (in copyright contexts) referred only to reconstructing an author's physical creation so as to serve a similar purpose. Although this understanding informed each subsequent codification - as Congress opted to work around this construed meaning rather than tinker with it - courts proceeded to depart dramatically from this conception. No legislation has actually redefined it, and no legislative record even indicates any intent to that effect, yet precedent increasingly finds any activity involving protected expression to presumptively implicate the reproduction right. Contemporary case law neglects the traditional, exacting standard - whether through faulty historical analyses, efforts to modernize arguably dated policies, or both. In this Article, I analyze the history and codifications of the exclusive reproduction right, urging a more narrow and concrete definition predicated on the original understanding of "copy." Applying statutory originalism to Congressional grants of intellectual property, I submit that any legitimate modification to the copyright bargain must come affirmatively from the legislative branch.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: intellectual property, copyright, originalism, technology

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 29, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Alfano, Kenneth M., Copyright in Exile: Restoring the Original Parameters of Exclusive Reproduction. Journal of Technology Law & Policy, Vol. 11, pp. 215-258, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=974976

Contact Information

Kenneth M. Alfano (Contact Author)
University of Michigan - Ann Arbor ( email )
301 Gorguze Laboratory
2609 Draper
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 941
Downloads: 101
Download Rank: 181,170
Footnotes:  178

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.485 seconds