Penumbral Reasoning on the Right

Glenn Harlan Reynolds

University of Tennessee College of Law

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 140, p. 1333, April 1992

The use of penumbral reasoning in cases like Griswold v. Connecticut has received considerable criticism from so-called conservative constitutional commentators, most notably Robert Bork. This essay demonstrates that penumbral reasoning is also widely used by courts in service of results generally regarded as conservative, with much less controversy. Penumbral reasoning, it suggests, is an essential implement in the judicial toolbox, and worthy of more respect, and use, from courts that care about fidelity to constitutional text and structure.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: penumbral, constitutional law, Robert Bork, Griswold

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 26, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Reynolds, Glenn Harlan, Penumbral Reasoning on the Right. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 140, p. 1333, April 1992. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=975140

Contact Information

Glenn Harlan Reynolds (Contact Author)
University of Tennessee College of Law ( email )
1505 West Cumberland Avenue
Knoxville, TN 37996-1810
United States
865-974-6744 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,467
Downloads: 180
Download Rank: 124,497

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds