Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=975140
 


 



Penumbral Reasoning on the Right


Glenn Harlan Reynolds


University of Tennessee College of Law


University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 140, p. 1333, April 1992

Abstract:     
The use of penumbral reasoning in cases like Griswold v. Connecticut has received considerable criticism from so-called conservative constitutional commentators, most notably Robert Bork. This essay demonstrates that penumbral reasoning is also widely used by courts in service of results generally regarded as conservative, with much less controversy. Penumbral reasoning, it suggests, is an essential implement in the judicial toolbox, and worthy of more respect, and use, from courts that care about fidelity to constitutional text and structure.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: penumbral, constitutional law, Robert Bork, Griswold

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 26, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Reynolds, Glenn Harlan, Penumbral Reasoning on the Right. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 140, p. 1333, April 1992. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=975140

Contact Information

Glenn Harlan Reynolds (Contact Author)
University of Tennessee College of Law ( email )
1505 West Cumberland Avenue
Knoxville, TN 37996-1810
United States
865-974-6744 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,269
Downloads: 174
Download Rank: 99,710

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.219 seconds