Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=975686
 


 



The Federal Marriage Amendment: Unnecessary, Anti-Federalist, and Anti-Democratic (PA 570)


Dale Carpenter


University of Minnesota Law School


Cato Institute Policy Analysis, Vol. 570, April 2006

Abstract:     
Supporters of the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment claim that an amendment is needed immediately to prevent same-sex marriages from being forced on the nation. This paper offers four arguments against the proposed amendment: federal and state laws, along with constitutional doctrines, make court-ordered nationwide same-sex marriage unlikely for the foreseeable future; a constitutional amendment defining marriage would be a radical intrusion on federalism; a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage would be an unprecedented form of amendment; and the amendment as proposed reaches well beyond the stated concerns of its proponents.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: Cato, Dale Carpenter, PA 570, Federal Marriage Amendment, FMA, constitutional amendment, same-sex marriage, federalism

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 2, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Carpenter, Dale, The Federal Marriage Amendment: Unnecessary, Anti-Federalist, and Anti-Democratic (PA 570). Cato Institute Policy Analysis, Vol. 570, April 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=975686

Contact Information

Dale Carpenter (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 789
Downloads: 34

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.250 seconds