Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=976026
 
 

Citations (10)



 
 

Footnotes (215)



 


 



Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy


Paul H. Robinson


University of Pennsylvania Law School

John M. Darley


Princeton University


U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 07-12
Southern California Law Review, Vol. 81, No. 1, 2007

Abstract:     
Recent social science research suggests that many if not most judgments about criminal liability and punishment for serious wrongdoing are intuitional rather than reasoned. Further, such intuitions of justice are nuanced and widely shared, even though they concern matters that seem quite complex and subjective. While people may debate the source of these intuitions, it seems clear that, whatever their source, it must be one that is insulated from the influence of much of human experience because, if it were not, one would see differences in intuitions reflecting the vast differences in human existence across demographics and societies.

This article explores the serious implications of this reality for criminal law and criminal policy. For example, it may be unrealistic to expect the government to reeducate people away from their unhealthy interest in punishing serious wrongdoing, as is urged by some reformer, for it seems unlikely that the shared intuition that serious wrongdoing should be punished can be changed through social engineering, at least not through methods short of coercive indoctrination that liberal democracies would find unacceptable. Second, a criminal justice system that adopts rules that predictably and regularly fail to do justice or that regularly do injustice, will inevitably be widely seen as failing in a mission thought important by the community, even foundational, unless the system's unjust operation can be hidden, something that would be hard to do without breaching notions of press freedom and government transparency to which liberal democracies aspire. Finally, an understanding of the nature of people's intuitions of justice can provide more effective strategies for changing them. For example, it appears that legal and social reformers would do better not to fight people's shared intuitions of justice but rather to harness them in service of their reform programs.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 68

Keywords: criminal law and procedure, criminal liability, criminal punishment, social engineering, coercive indoctrination, government transparency, justice reform

JEL Classification: K14, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 27, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Robinson, Paul H. and Darley, John M., Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy. U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 07-12; Southern California Law Review, Vol. 81, No. 1, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=976026

Contact Information

Paul H. Robinson (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
John M. Darley
Princeton University ( email )
1-N-17 Green Hall
Princeton, NJ 08544
United States
609-258-3000 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,965
Downloads: 745
Download Rank: 17,236
Citations:  10
Footnotes:  215

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.422 seconds