My Patent, Your Patent, or Our Patent? Inventorship Disputes Within Academic Research Groups
Sean B. Seymore
Vanderbilt University - Law School
Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 16, pp. 125-167, 2006
The statutory requirement of identifying the first and true inventor is often muddled by the mores and practices of academic science. Unfortunately, and despite claims of scientists and attorneys to the contrary, I contend that the inventive entity is not discovered but rather determined in and through social relationships. Although universities should always strive to promulgate policies which fully comport with the law, the biggest incentive for universities to insist on correct inventorship is financial. I argue that the rise in mentee claims for sole or joint inventorship, as well as the ever-present threat of an inequitable conduct defense in a patent infringement suit, jeopardizes the ability of the university to generate royalties from licensing agreements. To protect this revenue stream, I contend that universities must revisit their “hands off” approach to the inner workings of the academic research group, at least with respect to determining the correct inventorship for a patent application.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
Keywords: patent, university, inventorship, authorship, technology transfer, research
JEL Classification: O34, K41, K19Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 1, 2007
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.609 seconds