Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=976711
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (250)



 


 



Antitrust Antifederalism


Daniel A. Crane


University of Michigan Law School


Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 187
California Law Review, 2007

Abstract:     
U.S. antitrust law has been profoundly influenced by a historical aversion to direct federal superintendence of corporations. This ideological impulse began with Antifederalist opposition to Madison's proposal to grant Congress a general incorporation power and carried over to the Progressive Era where it defeated a proposed corporate regulatory model of antitrust. The antitrust antifederalist impulse thus enabled the rise of the competing crime-tort model, in which antitrust law creates a freestanding norm of industrial competition rather than a regulatory apparatus for policing the capital-concentrating effects of incorporation statutes. As it has interacted with the general features of the U.S. civil litigation apparatus, this crime-tort conceptualization has produced a variety of pathologies including an excessive focus on locating a "bad act" rather than specifying appropriate corporate structure; delegation of adjudicatory decision-making to generalist judges and juries rather than industrial policy specialists; the predominance of private enforcement over public enforcement; extension of antitrust law to non-corporate subjects, particularly the working class; and interference with federal competition policy by parochially interested state regulators. The one major exception to antitrust antifederalism's continuing dominance - the pre-merger notification system adopted in 1976 - reveals the advantages of the corporate regulatory model and suggests some steps that could be taken to rationalize the institutional structure of antitrust law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Keywords: Antitrust, federalism, corporate regulation

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 28, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Crane, Daniel A., Antitrust Antifederalism. Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 187; California Law Review, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=976711

Contact Information

Daniel A. Crane (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
734-615-2622 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,243
Downloads: 204
Download Rank: 82,458
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  250

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.000 seconds