Pain Detection and the Privacy of Subjective Experience
Adam J. Kolber
Brooklyn Law School
American Journal of Law & Medicine (Brain Imaging & The Law Symposium), Vol. 33, p. 433, 2007
San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 07-92
Pain is a fundamentally subjective experience. We have uniquely direct access to our own pain but can only make rough inferences about the pain of others. Nevertheless, such inferences are made all the time by doctors, insurers, judges, juries, and administrative agencies. Advances in brain imaging may someday improve our pain assessments by bolstering the claims of those genuinely experiencing pain while impugning the claims of those who are faking or exaggerating symptoms. These possibilities raise concerns about the privacy of our pain. I suggest that while the use of neuroimaging to detect pain implicates significant privacy concerns, our interests in keeping pain private are likely to be weaker than our interests in keeping private certain other subjective experiences that permit more intrusive inferences about our thoughts and character.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: Neuroimaging, Neuroethics, Pain, Subjective Experience, Privacy
Date posted: March 29, 2007 ; Last revised: December 13, 2007
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.156 seconds