Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=976896
 
 

Footnotes (90)



 


 



Why Phyllis Schlafly is Right (But She's Wrong) About Pornography


Andrew Koppelman


Northwestern University School of Law


Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Forthcoming
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 07-07

Abstract:     
Phyllis Schlafly's preeminent concern is to preserve a pattern of gender-specific roles and relations that, she thinks, have helped protect women and children from desertion and abuse. She wants to suppress pornography because it helps to reinforce a vernacular masculine culture that is indifferent or hostile to the needs of women and children. Schlafly's worries about this culture are legitimate and valid. But the suppression of pornography is the wrong solution to the problem, because no workable legal rule can properly delimit the material that concerns her. The antecedents of Schlafly's views on gender, in Rousseau's political theory and the nineteenth century ideology of domesticity, and their contemporary applicability are examined.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: Public Policy

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 29, 2007 ; Last revised: May 10, 2009

Suggested Citation

Koppelman, Andrew, Why Phyllis Schlafly is Right (But She's Wrong) About Pornography. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Forthcoming; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 07-07. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=976896

Contact Information

Andrew M. Koppelman (Contact Author)
Northwestern University School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-503-8431 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 921
Downloads: 125
Download Rank: 128,197
Footnotes:  90

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.719 seconds