Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=976930
 
 

Citations (10)



 
 

Footnotes (102)



 


 



The Empire's New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law


Eyal Benvenisti


Tel Aviv University, Faculty of Law

George W. Downs


New York University (NYU)


Stanford Law Review, Vol. 60, 2007

Abstract:     
The decades following the end of the Cold War have witnessed the growing proliferation of international regulatory institutions with overlapping jurisdictions and ambiguous boundaries. Practicing jurists have expressed concern about the effects of this increased fragmentation of international law, but for the most part international legal theorists have tended to dismiss such concerns as unwarranted. Indeed, many regard the resulting competition for influence among institutions as a generative, market-like pluralism that has produced more progress toward integration and democratization than could ever have been achieved through more formal means.

In this essay we argue that the problem of fragmentation is more serious than it is commonly assumed to be and also more resistant to reform by the various decentralized mechanisms that operate in international law such as governmental networks. Fragmentation's resistance to reform stems from the fact that it is only partly the accidental byproduct of broad social forces such as globalization. It also represents an ongoing effort on the part of powerful states to preserve their dominance in an era in which hierarchy is increasingly viewed as illegitimate, and to reduce their accountability both domestically and internationally. Fragmentation accomplishes this in three ways. First, by creating institutions along narrow functionalist lines and restricting the scope of multilateral agreements, it limits the opportunities that weaker actors have to build the cross-issue coalitions that are necessary to increase their bargaining power and influence. Second, the ambiguous boundaries and overlapping authority created by fragmentation dramatically increase the transaction costs that international legal bodies must incur in trying to reintegrate or rationalize the resulting legal order. Third, by suggesting the absence of design and obscuring the role of intentionality, fragmentation frees powerful states from having to assume responsibility for the shortcomings of a global legal system that they themselves have played a preponderant role in creating. The result is a regulatory order that both reflects powerful state interests and that only they can alter.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: fragmentation, international law, international institutions

JEL Classification: F33, K33

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 29, 2007 ; Last revised: July 12, 2009

Suggested Citation

Benvenisti, Eyal and Downs, George W., The Empire's New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law. Stanford Law Review, Vol. 60, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=976930

Contact Information

Eyal Benvenisti (Contact Author)
Tel Aviv University, Faculty of Law ( email )
Ramat Aviv
Tel Aviv 69978
Israel
George W. Downs
New York University (NYU) ( email )
Bobst Library, E-resource Acquisitions
20 Cooper Square 3rd Floor
New York, NY 10003-711
United States
212-998-8020 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,661
Downloads: 769
Download Rank: 16,773
Citations:  10
Footnotes:  102

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 2.969 seconds