Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=976953
 
 

Footnotes (288)



 


 



The Brand X Constitution


Richard W. Murphy


Texas Tech University School of Law


Brigham Young Law Review, No. 5, 2007
William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 65

Abstract:     
Scholars from across the political spectrum have in recent years attacked the Supreme Court's claim to supreme power to interpret the Constitution. This Article adds to this movement of "popular constitutionalism" by deploying the Supreme Court's own doctrine against it. Recent developments in the Chevron doctrine have culminated in what might be called, after the case that gave it form, the Brand X model of statutory interpretation. Broadly speaking, this model requires courts to uphold an agency's reasonable interpretation of a statute it administers - even in the teeth of contrary precedent - so long as the agency used transparent, deliberative means to adopt it. Translating this Brand X model into a constitutional setting, this Article claims that courts should uphold reasonable legislative constitutional constructions that are expressly stated in focused federal legislation even if they contradict contrary Supreme Court precedent. This proposal would thus require the Supreme Court to extend about as much deference to select legislative precedents as it now indulges its own judicial precedents. Adopting this approach would expand in an incremental and controlled way the voice of the public, Congress, and the President in constitutional construction. The most fundamental reason to pursue this change is that choosing among reasonable constitutional constructions is a political task that depends on value judgments and related assessments of legislative fact. In a representative democracy, the problem of making such policy choices should be committed ultimately to public judgment rather than nine life-tenured judges.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 62

Keywords: popular constitutionalism, legislative precedent, stare decisis, Chevron, Thayer, judicial deference

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 26, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Murphy, Richard W., The Brand X Constitution. Brigham Young Law Review, No. 5, 2007; William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 65. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=976953

Contact Information

Richard Wyman Murphy (Contact Author)
Texas Tech University School of Law ( email )
1802 Hartford
Lubbock, TX 79409
United States
806-742-3990 ex.320 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,272
Downloads: 165
Download Rank: 106,853
Footnotes:  288

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.297 seconds