Collaborative Reproduction and Rethinking Parentage
Charles P. Kindregan, Jr.
Suffolk University Law School
Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, Vol. 21, p. 43, 2008
Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 07-16
Collaborative Reproduction and Rethinking Parentage, by Charles P. Kindregan, Jr., questions the traditional methods of determining legal parenthood in the light of increased use of collaborative reproduction to have children. Historically motherhood was determined by giving birth, and fatherhood either by paternity proceedings or application of a legal presumption that the husband of the birth mother was the father. The only significant exception to these tests was statutorily-authorized adoption. But with the advent of such collaborative reproductive technologies as intrauterine insemination by donor sperm, in vitro fertilization by use of donor gametes, embryo donation and transfer, surrogate birthing, and (in the near future) reproductive cloning children are being conceived and born in circumstances which do not fit the traditional tests. Collaborative reproduction is largely unregulated by law, except for a few statutes and court decisions in a few states, and the author argues that genetic or adoptive tests for legal parenthood can no longer be universally applied. The challenge to the law will be the creation of new doctrines, such as intended parent or de facto parent will have to gain greater recognition in order to avoid confusion as to who is legally responsible for children.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16
Keywords: Collaborative reproduction, assisted reproduction, parent, parentage, embryos, gametes, genetics, birth mother, surrogacyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 3, 2007 ; Last revised: August 19, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.563 seconds