Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=977257
 
 

Footnotes (202)



 


 



The Executive's Duty to Disregard Unconstitutional Laws


Saikrishna Prakash


University of Virginia School of Law

March 29, 2007

San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 07-95

Abstract:     
Recent Presidents have asserted a power to ignore statutes that they believe are unconstitutional. Critics have made an array of arguments against these assertions. As a matter of text, the Faithful Execution Clause bars such non-enforcement. As a matter of history, the English specifically prohibited a discretionary power to disregard statutes. And American Presidents did not assume a power to ignore unconstitutional statutes until almost a century after the Constitution's creation. Taken together, these arguments are said to refute the regal pretensions of modern Presidents. This Article serves as an antidote to such claims while sharpening our understanding of Executive Disregard. The critics are correct in arguing that the President lacks a discretionary power to refuse to enforce unconstitutional statutes. Instead, the President has a duty to disregard such laws that arises from two sources. First, the Constitution never empowers the President to enforce unconstitutional statues. He no more has the power to enforce such statutes than he has power to enforce the statutes of Georgia or Germany. Second, the President's duty to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution requires the President to disregard unconstitutional statutes. When the President enforces a statute he regards as unconstitutional, he acts to violate the Constitution no less than he would were he to imprison citizens without hope of trial. Both John Adams and Thomas Jefferson argued that executives could not enforce unconstitutional statutes, with Jefferson being the first President to actually invoke the duty of Executive Disregard. Upon entering office, Jefferson ordered the termination of Sedition Act prosecutions on the grounds that the Sedition Act was unconstitutional. Jefferson justified his non-enforcement decision by arguing that the Sedition Act was no law at all and by noting that he had a duty to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution, a duty that prevented him from implementing measures that violated it.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60

Keywords: oath, duty, non-enforce, take care, execution, President

JEL Classification: K00, K1, K10

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 30, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Prakash, Saikrishna, The Executive's Duty to Disregard Unconstitutional Laws (March 29, 2007). San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 07-95. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=977257 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.977257

Contact Information

Saikrishna Prakash (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 321
Downloads: 52
Download Rank: 94,639
Footnotes:  202

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.219 seconds