Footnotes (305)



Using Stock and Stock Options to Minimize Patent Royalty Payment Risks After Medimmune v. Genentech

Sean M. O'Connor

University of Washington - School of Law

New York University Journal of Law and Business, Vol. 3, p. 381, 2007

The Supreme Court's recent decision in MedImmune v. Genentech left patent owners who license out their patents in exchange for royalty streams in a bad spot. It is an especially dire spot for patent owners such as universities who incur substantial opportunity costs when they grant an exclusive license to a licensee who pays relatively little up front, in exchange for paying a potentially sizable royalty stream if or when products based on the patents are successfully commercialized and sold in the marketplace. Because the MedImmune decision allows such licensees to bring declaratory judgment actions to invalidate the patent or establish the licensee's products as non-infringing with no particular trigger and without repudiating the licensee (and thus avoiding the possibility of a patent owner suit for infringement), it is expected that licensees will take a license just to buy time to develop a product with relative freedom to operate and then attempt to invalidate the patent once a product looks like it will become profitable and royalties would have to be paid. While some have suggested that the solution to this is simply for patent owners to demand full payment of the net present value of the royalty stream up front, this will simply not be possible for many start up and mid sized companies who license technologies from universities and other routine licensors. The author instead proposes a method for licensors to take some combination of stock and stock options in the licensee - that essentially the licensee can "afford" to pay in the near term even while short on cash and revenues - while still allowing the licensor to participate in the potential upside of a successful commercialization effort of the licensor's patents by the licensee, but in a manner that is fully accrued to the licensor upon the execution of the license.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 63

Keywords: licensing, MedImmune, Genentech, running royalties, tech transfer, patents, universities, start-ups, spin-offs

JEL Classification: D23, D45, K22, M13, O31, O32, O33, O34, O38

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 1, 2007 ; Last revised: February 14, 2014

Suggested Citation

O'Connor, Sean M., Using Stock and Stock Options to Minimize Patent Royalty Payment Risks After Medimmune v. Genentech. New York University Journal of Law and Business, Vol. 3, p. 381, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=977342

Contact Information

Sean M. O'Connor (Contact Author)
University of Washington - School of Law ( email )
William H. Gates Hall
Box 353020
Seattle, WA 98105-3020
United States
206-543-7491 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.washington.edu/faculty/oconnor

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,699
Downloads: 319
Download Rank: 61,434
Footnotes:  305
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.313 seconds