|
||||
|
||||
A Critique of Partial Leniency for Cartels
by the U.S. Department of Justice John M. Connor Purdue University; American Antitrust Institute (AAI) Abstract: This paper models a key outcome of secret negotiations: partial-leniency fine discounts from plea bargaining in criminal price-fixing cases. Models tested explain up to 52% of variation in percentage discounts. A minor portion is explained by such defendants characteristics as the defendants rank in queue and delay in settling. Most variation is explained by cartel characteristics. International conspiracies, global cartels, and bid-rigging schemes are granted lower percentage than domestic price-fixing. Discounts were higher in the Bush II than in the Clinton administration. Participants in durable conspiracies are rewarded with larger discounts, but more severe treatment of recidivists cannot be detected.
Keywords: antitrust, cartel, price fixing, deterrence, penalties, fines, discounts, Department of Justice JEL Classifications: K21, K14, L41, L44, L65, L11, L13, N60 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: April 06, 2007 ; Last revised: June 09, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo 4 in 0.109 seconds.