|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id1141852. ; Size: 189K
|
|
A Critique of Partial Leniency for Cartels
by the U.S. Department of Justice
John M. Connor Purdue University; American Antitrust Institute (AAI)
Abstract:
This paper models a key outcome of secret negotiations: partial-leniency fine discounts from plea bargaining in criminal price-fixing cases. Models tested explain up to 52% of variation in percentage discounts. A minor portion is explained by such defendants characteristics as the defendants rank in queue and delay in settling. Most variation is explained by cartel characteristics. International conspiracies, global cartels, and bid-rigging schemes are granted lower percentage than domestic price-fixing. Discounts were higher in the Bush II than in the Clinton administration. Participants in durable conspiracies are rewarded with larger discounts, but more severe treatment of recidivists cannot be detected.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 58
Keywords: antitrust, cartel, price fixing, deterrence, penalties, fines, discounts, Department of Justice
JEL Classification: K21, K14, L41, L44, L65, L11, L13, N60
working papers series
Download This Paper
Date posted: April 6, 2007
; Last revised: June 9, 2008
Suggested CitationConnor, John M., A Critique of Partial Leniency for Cartels
by the U.S. Department of Justice. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=977772 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.977772
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
|
|
|
|