Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=977852
 
 

Footnotes (275)



 


 



It's a Wonderful Life


Ronen Perry


University of Haifa - Faculty of Law


Cornell Law Review, Vol. 93, pp. 329-99, 2008

Abstract:     
The title of Frank Capra's classic 1946 movie seems to encapsulate a fundamental all-American conviction. Unsurprisingly, it has been applied by several courts and jurists as the ultimate retort to one of the most intriguing questions in modern tort discourse: Is it possible to say that a severely disabled child has been harmed by the mere fact of being born? Wrongful life claimants will answer in the affirmative, whereas Capra's aphorism makes a compelling counterargument. In my opinion, the contrasting views represent equally legitimate subjective beliefs rather than objective truths; so neither may ever prevail. Having no satisfactory solution within conventional wisdom, the life-as-injury debate may be regarded as the Gordian knot of tort law. The purpose of the Article is to cut, rather than untie the knot: Allow the child to recover, without challenging or validating the deep-seated perception of life.

Part I shows that the hostility to liability in tort for wrongful life is almost a universal phenomenon, crossing lands and seas. Part II argues that this demurral is ultimately rooted in the absence of one of the central components of the cause of action. A tort action must fail because of the inability - logical and practical - to establish "harm" under the traditional definition of this term. Part III opines that since the Gordian knot of tort law cannot be untied it must be cut altogether. The traditional framework, giving rise to an insoluble problem, should be replaced with a more promising contractual framework, inspired by the celebrated case of Hawkins v. McGee. In my view, the child's action may be based on the claim that the defendant promised her parents that she would be born without a certain defect, and that the promise was not fulfilled. In formal terms, the child is an intended third-party beneficiary of the contract concluded between her parents and the consultant, in which the latter warranted that she would not be born with a particular disability. The warranty of the future child's physical integrity and health, being an integral and inseparable part of the contract, should form the basis of her cause of action.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 104

Keywords: tort law, contracts, value of life, wrongful life, abortion, it's a wonderful life, Capra

JEL Classification: K13

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 4, 2007 ; Last revised: July 21, 2008

Suggested Citation

Perry, Ronen, It's a Wonderful Life. Cornell Law Review, Vol. 93, pp. 329-99, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=977852

Contact Information

Ronen Perry (Contact Author)
University of Haifa - Faculty of Law ( email )
Mount Carmel
Haifa, 31905
Israel
HOME PAGE: http://weblaw.haifa.ac.il/en/faculty/perry/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 6,373
Downloads: 1,086
Download Rank: 10,178
Footnotes:  275

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds