Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=977998
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (47)



 


 



Reflections on Remedies and Philip Morris v. Williams


Keith N. Hylton


Boston University; Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law

April 2, 2007

Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 07-06

Abstract:     
This essay is a series of reflections on the implications of Philip Morris for the tort reform movement. I make an effort below to find a middle ground between the positions of the plaintiff and defendant in Philip Morris. That middle ground involves largely returning to the Supreme Court's pre-Gore treatment of punitive damages and introducing new procedural devices for defendants to challenge awards. I close with a few observations on the implications of this case law for pain and suffering awards.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: tort reform, remedies, punitive damages, Philip Morris, multiplier, class actions

JEL Classification: K00, K13, K41

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 6, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Hylton, Keith N., Reflections on Remedies and Philip Morris v. Williams (April 2, 2007). Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 07-06. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=977998 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.977998

Contact Information

Keith N. Hylton (Contact Author)
Boston University ( email )
595 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-8959 (Phone)
Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-8959 (Phone)
617-353-3077 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 783
Downloads: 183
Download Rank: 98,485
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  47

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.296 seconds