|
||||
|
||||
Reflections on Remedies and Philip Morris v. WilliamsKeith N. HyltonBoston University April 2, 2007 Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 07-06 Abstract: This essay is a series of reflections on the implications of Philip Morris for the tort reform movement. I make an effort below to find a middle ground between the positions of the plaintiff and defendant in Philip Morris. That middle ground involves largely returning to the Supreme Court's pre-Gore treatment of punitive damages and introducing new procedural devices for defendants to challenge awards. I close with a few observations on the implications of this case law for pain and suffering awards.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21 Keywords: tort reform, remedies, punitive damages, Philip Morris, multiplier, class actions JEL Classification: K00, K13, K41 working papers seriesDate posted: April 6, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.297 seconds