SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (127)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Leave it to the Lower Courts: On Judicial Intervention in Election Administration

Daniel P. Tokaji
Ohio State University - Michael E. Moritz College of Law



Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 68, 2007

Abstract:     
This essay addresses the proper scope of judicial intervention in the field of election administration. It argues that the Supreme Court would generally do best to leave issues of election administration to the lower courts, at least in the short term.

The essay begins by surveying the doctrinal and institutional changes resulting from Florida's 2000 election controversy, including the two leading equal protection theories that Bush v. Gore spawned. It then looks to the lower courts, assessing their handling of cases involving voting technology and voter identification. The essay concludes that the lower courts, especially district courts, have generally done a good job of handling this litigation. On the other hand, in the one significant post-2000 case where the Supreme Court intervened, Purcell v. Gonzalez, it issued an opinion which betrays its failure carefully to think through the appropriate role of federal judiciary in election administration and threatens to distort equal protection doctrine.

As Purcell illustrates, several features of election administration litigation call for particular restraint on the part of the Court: (1) the factual complexity of these cases, (2) the weighty democratic values asserted on both sides, (3) the unusual procedural context in which these cases tend to arise, which often necessitate expedited consideration, and (4) the heated political atmosphere in which these controversies tend to arise. These considerations suggest that the Court would do best to allow a thorough percolation of election administration issues in the lower court rather than interventing as it did in Purcell. Such intervention threatens to undermine the Court's institutional credibility, particularly when it comes to hot-button issues like voter identification that have a pronounced partisan valence.

Keywords: election law, election administration, voting technology, voter ID, voting rights

JEL Classifications: H11, K40, K41

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: April 04, 2007 ; Last revised: April 04, 2007

Suggested Citation

Tokaji, Daniel P., Leave it to the Lower Courts: On Judicial Intervention in Election Administration. Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 68, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=978290


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Daniel P. Tokaji (Contact Author)
Ohio State University - Michael E. Moritz College of Law ( email )
55 West 12th Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 760
Downloads: 100
Download Rank: 78,805
Footnotes: 127

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.125 seconds.