Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=979351
 
 

References (36)



 


 



Instead of a Doctrine: Penn Central as the Supreme Court's Retreat from the Rule of Law


R. S. Radford


Pacific Legal Foundation

March 30, 2007

Pacific Legal Foundation Working Paper No. 07-001

Abstract:     
When the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, it had not decided a regulatory takings case in over half a century. Penn Central's tortured and opaque analysis did little to move takings jurisprudence beyond Justice Holmes' cryptic 1922 maxim, "if regulation goes too far it will be recognized as a taking." The Court did little to elaborate on the meaning or weight of Penn Central's vague criteria - the nature of the government action, the economic impact of the regulation, or the owner's distinct investment-backed expectations - preferring instead to enunciate new bright line rules in Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. and Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council. It even appeared to abandon Penn Central's terminology altogether in Agins v. City of Tiburon. But in the waning years of the Rehnquist Court, most of the newer formulations of takings doctrine were undermined, scaled back, or abandoned altogether in decisions like Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and Lingle v. Chevron, USA, Inc. It now falls to the Roberts Court to go back three decades and begin fleshing out the meaning of Penn Central as the Court's "polestar" of regulatory takings law for the 21st century.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: Penn Central, investment-backed expectations, regulatory takings, rule of law

JEL Classification: K11, K10

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 12, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Radford, R. S., Instead of a Doctrine: Penn Central as the Supreme Court's Retreat from the Rule of Law (March 30, 2007). Pacific Legal Foundation Working Paper No. 07-001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=979351 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.979351

Contact Information

R. S. Radford (Contact Author)
Pacific Legal Foundation ( email )
Sacramento, CA 95827
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.pacificlegal.org/empBio.asp?e=26&t=4&s=Property+Rights
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 599
Downloads: 61
Download Rank: 208,778
References:  36

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.359 seconds