Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=979390
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (113)



 


 



Takings: An Appreciative Retrospective


Eric R. Claeys


George Mason University


William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 439-55, December 2006

Abstract:     
This Essay contributed to a conference held at William and Mary Law School at which Richard Epstein was awarded the 2005 Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Prize. The Essay surveys the legacy of Epstein's 1985 book Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain.

Doctrinally, Takings was provocative because it provided a persuasive roadmap by which originalist judges might revive natural-law-based property and contract rights often associated with Lochner v. New York. However, this possibility was always somewhat overdrawn. On one hand, most judges and academics are not originalists but functionalists, and they reject Epstein's classical-liberal property theory on substantive grounds. On the other, serious originalists question the textual foundations for Epstein's project, because they doubt that the Takings Clause applies to the states by substantive due process incorporation. This section closes by considering briefly whether Takings' doctrinal claims might be grounded in the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment Privileges or Immunities Clause.

Takings has done far more to affect legal property theory. When Takings was written, the U.S. Supreme Court and academic opinion leaders subscribed uniformly to bundle of rights property theory, which had been developed by Legal Realists in the 1920s to facilitate relatively interventionist theories of government. Takings' most important legacy was to make accessible and respectable again, in contemporary legal academic jargon, the unitary theory of property applied by American natural-law jurists and replaced by the Realist bundle of rights. This section criticizes Epstein for using welfarist utilitarianism to replace the natural-law foundations on which Lochner cases and jurists relied to justify the unitary theory of property. But the Essay concludes by praising Epstein for helping contemporary legal academics appreciate the demands that a classical-liberal understanding of freedom places on property.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: Richard Epstein, takings, eminent domain, property, natural law, natural rights

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 13, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Claeys, Eric R., Takings: An Appreciative Retrospective. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 439-55, December 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=979390

Contact Information

Eric R. Claeys (Contact Author)
George Mason University ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Room 420
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
(703) 993-8247 (Phone)
(703) 993-8202 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 681
Downloads: 109
Download Rank: 147,141
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  113

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds