The Secret Politics of the Compatibilist Criminal Law
Thomas Jefferson School of Law
Kansas Law Review, Vol. 55, p. 365, 2007
TJSL Legal Studies Research Paper No. 979421
Many criminal theorists say that we have a 'compatibilist' criminal law, by which they mean that in our criminal law a person can deserve punishment for her acts even if she does not have 'genuinely' free will. This conception of the criminal law harbors and is driven by a secret politics, one that resists social change and idealizes the existing social order. In this Article, I map this secret politics. In so doing, I call into question the descriptive accuracy of the compatibilist account of the criminal law, and set the stage for a franker discussion of criminal punishment - one that recognizes that the perpetual struggle to say just who 'deserves' punishment is driven as much by brute politics and the competition to allocate power and resources in society as by any independent moral logic.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 63
Keywords: Compatibilism, Compatibilist Criminal Law, Originationism, Originationist Criminal Law, Responsibility, Criminal Responsibility, Moral Responsibility
JEL Classification: K14
Date posted: April 12, 2007 ; Last revised: August 5, 2008
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds