Adopting a Label: Heterogeneity in the Economic Consequences of IFRS Adoptions
University of Mannheim
University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School
University of Chicago - Booth School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Center for Financial Studies (CFS); University of Pennsylvania - Wharton Financial Institutions Center; CESifo Research Network
Rodrigo S. Verdi
affiliation not provided to SSRN
October 31, 2009
This paper examines market liquidity and cost of capital effects associated with voluntary IFRS adoptions around the world. In contrast to prior work, we focus on the heterogeneity in the economic consequences, recognizing that firms have considerable discretion in how they implement IFRS. Some firms may simply adopt the label, while for others IFRS adoption may be part of a strategy to increase their commitment to transparency. To illustrate these differences, we classify firms into ‘label’ and ‘serious’ adopters using changes in firms’ underlying reporting incentives and actual reporting behavior, and then analyze whether capital markets respond differently around IFRS adoptions. We find that, on average, voluntary IFRS adoptions are not associated with capital market benefits, especially when compared to other forms of commitment such as cross-listing in the U.S. Consistent with our predictions, we find an increase in market liquidity and a decline in the cost of capital for ‘serious’ adopters. These benefits are likely attributable to broader changes in firms’ commitment to transparency, and not just IFRS.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 63
Keywords: International accounting, Reporting incentives, IAS, U.S. GAAP, Disclosure, Cost of equity, Enforcement, IFRS implementation
JEL Classification: G14, G15, G30, K22, M41, M47
Date posted: April 12, 2007 ; Last revised: June 15, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.750 seconds