Sex, Lies and Jurisprudence: Robert Bork, Griswold, and the Philosophy of Original Understanding
Glenn Harlan Reynolds
University of Tennessee College of Law
Georgia Law Review, Vol. 31, p. 1045, 1990
This article analyzes Robert Bork's philosophy of original understanding jurisprudence in the context of the Supreme Court's decision in Griswold v. Connecticut, and concludes that Bork's theory does not perform as advertised and in fact -- contrary to Bork's representations -- actually supports the outcome reached by the Supreme Court in the Griswold case. It nonetheless concludes that original understanding interpretation has something to offer, if not as much as Bork claims.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 78
Keywords: reynolds, bork, penumbra, original understanding, griswold, connecticutAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 13, 2007
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.266 seconds