Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=979818
 
 

Footnotes (35)



 


 



Judges as Mediators: Retaining Neutrality and Avoiding the Trap of Social Engineering


Steven A. Certilman


Steven A. Certilman, PC


International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, Vol. 73, pp. 24-30, 2007

Abstract:     
As jurisdictions have begun to regulate laymen and attorneys practicing as mediators, few have provided guidelines for judges serving as mediators. Decisiveness and the willingness to use the authority of office may be the very traits which make judges effective dispute resolvers and administrators but they may also be anathema to mediation's collaborative nature, where the buy-in of the parties is essential to success. Judges serving as mediators should be trained to leave their judicial demeanor in chambers and focus on the non-adjudicative nature of mediation. The use of coercive techniques will do damage to the public's perception of the mediation process and should be eliminated.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: Mediation, Mediators, Judges, Neutrality, Clergy Cases I

JEL Classification: K40, K41, K49

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 13, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Certilman, Steven A., Judges as Mediators: Retaining Neutrality and Avoiding the Trap of Social Engineering. International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, Vol. 73, pp. 24-30, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=979818

Contact Information

Steven A. Certilman (Contact Author)
Steven A. Certilman, PC ( email )
350 Bedford Street
Suite 403
Stamford, CT 06901
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,260
Downloads: 185
Download Rank: 94,890
Footnotes:  35

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.609 seconds