Gambling, Commodity Speculation, and the 'Victorian Compromise'
Joshua C. Tate
Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law
Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, Vol. 19, pp. 97-114, 2007
Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 8
This Essay examines two major strands of nineteenth-century jurisprudence related to gambling: Southern cases defining public and private space for the purpose of state gambling statutes, and Northern cases applying the intent to deliver test to speculative contracts. The Essay argues that both lines of cases reflect what Lawrence Friedman has termed the Victorian compromise: A strong official stance against immoral behavior is conjoined with de facto acceptance of many questionable practices, provided that they are conducted in a manner acceptable to the elite. The Essay concludes that nineteenth-century judges sought to preserve the semblance of a strict prohibition against gambling while allowing more socially acceptable forms of speculation to pass muster.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18
Keywords: legal history, gambling, commodities, contracts, criminal lawAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 13, 2007 ; Last revised: May 30, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds