SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (2)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: The Interpretation and Application of Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties

William W. Burke-White
University of Pennsylvania Law School

Andreas Von Staden
Technical University Darmstadt; Princeton University - Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs; The American Society of International Law



Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 48, p. 307, 2007
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 07-14

Abstract:     
When threatened by crises such as global terrorism, financial collapse, pandemic diseases, and natural disasters, states may resort to measures that harm the interests of foreign investors protected under the bilateral investment treaty (BIT) regime. Many such BITs, however, contain heretofore under-studied clauses that preclude liability for state actions taken in response to exceptional circumstances. These non-precluded measures (NPM) clauses effectively transfer the risk of and costs associated with state action in exceptional circumstances from the host-states of international investments to the investors. In two recent cases brought against Argentina in response to the Argentine financial crisis, ICSID tribunals have interpreted the NPM clause in the U.S.-Argentina BIT in radically different ways, with one tribunal holding Argentina liable and the other excusing Argentina from compensating investors. This article provides the first detailed study of NPM clauses in international investment law. It argues that NPM clauses are, in fact, a widespread element of the international law of foreign investment. To guide states, investors, and arbitral tribunals, the article offers a framework for the interpretation of NPM clauses, based on the practice of key states including the U.S., Germany, and India. In so doing, the article imports the margin of appreciation doctrine from European human rights law into international investment arbitration as a mechanism for determining the scope of deference to be accorded to critical state policies by ad hoc arbitral tribunals. More generally, the article argues that the risk-allocation function performed by NPM clauses is of considerable significance to the depth of international legal cooperation, the response of states to international crises, and the flow of international investments.

Keywords: International Law, International Trade, economic crises, foreign investors, BIT, bilateral investment treaty regime, NPM clauses, non-precluded measure clauses, risk allocation, margin of appreciation doctrine

JEL Classifications: K33

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: April 14, 2007 ; Last revised: June 19, 2009

Suggested Citation

Burke-White, William W. and Von Staden, Andreas, Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: The Interpretation and Application of Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties. Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 48, p. 307, 2007; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 07-14. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=980107


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

William W. Burke-White (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3400 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6204
United States
Andreas Von Staden
Technical University Darmstadt ( email )
Research Cluster "Formation of Normative Orders"
Residenzschloss
Darmstadt, Hesse 62483
Germany
Princeton University - Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs ( email )
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ 08544-1021
United States
The American Society of International Law ( email )
2223 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20008
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,740
Downloads: 442
Download Rank: 16,909
Citations: 2

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.141 seconds.