SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (35)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Do Blogs Influence SSRN Downloads? Empirically Testing the Volokh and Slashdot Effects

Paul Ohm
University of Colorado Law School


April 14, 2007

U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-15

Abstract:     
SSRN's download statistics are criticized for being biased in favor of bloggers. Just how does the supposed bias work, and how strong is it?

This paper reports the results of a small empirical study undertaken in April, 2007. While guest-blogging at the Volokh Conspiracy, the author used a small computer program to collect SSRN Abstract View and Download statistics every fifteen minutes.

The study took on an unexpected dimension when links to some of the author's blog posts appeared in an article on the Slashdot website, one of the most widely-read technology websites. This allowed the author to compare the Volokh Effect with the better known and more often studied Slashdot Effect.

This is a quickly-compiled draft summarizing and analyzing the results.

The odds are very good that the author is collecting data about this abstract page, as well.

Keywords: ssrn, blogs, blogging, empirical law, colorful graphs

Working Paper Series

Date posted: April 16, 2007 ; Last revised: July 09, 2007

Suggested Citation

Ohm, Paul, Do Blogs Influence SSRN Downloads? Empirically Testing the Volokh and Slashdot Effects (April 14, 2007). U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=980484


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Paul Ohm (Contact Author)
University of Colorado Law School ( email )
401 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309
United States
303-492-0384 (Phone)
303-492-1200 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,139
Downloads: 165
Download Rank: 51,559
Footnotes: 35

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.125 seconds.