Footnotes (158)



Stem Cell Research and the Cloning Wars

Russell B. Korobkin

UCLA School of Law

Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 18, p. 161, 2007
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 07-12

An important aspect of stem cell research has become caught in the crossfire of a battle over human cloning. The House of Representatives has passed legislation twice that would prohibit therapeutic cloning - the cloning of cells for the purpose of creating disease-specific human embryonic stem cell lines and individualized stem cell treatments - along with cloning for the purpose of creating babies with genomes identical to a living person. This article evaluates the public policy and constitutional law issues implicated by the Human Cloning Prohibition Act. It concludes that there are no convincing policy justifications for bans that extent to therapeutic cloning, and that such a ban would negatively impact the important constitutional values of federalism, individual interests in pursuing medical treatments, and, indirectly, individual interests in reproductive autonomy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: stem cells, cloning, somatic cell nuclear transfer, federalism, substantive due process

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 24, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Korobkin, Russell B., Stem Cell Research and the Cloning Wars. Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 18, p. 161, 2007; UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 07-12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=980804

Contact Information

Russell B. Korobkin (Contact Author)
UCLA School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-825-1994 (Phone)
310-206-7010 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,489
Downloads: 305
Download Rank: 73,477
Footnotes:  158

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.281 seconds