|
||||
|
||||
Canada's Private Copying Levy - Does it Comply With Canada's International Treaty Obligations?Andrew F. ChristieMelbourne Law School John DavidsonIndependent Fiona RotsteinMelbourne Law School U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 222 Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 111-134, 2006 Abstract: The Canadian private copying scheme imposes a statutory levy on blank audio recording media, to compensate composers, performers and producers of sound recordings for the private copying of their subject matter that is permitted under the scheme. While both Canadian and foreign composers are entitled to receive payment under the levy, only Canadian performers and sound recording makers, and performers and makers from a country that provides reciprocal rights to Canadians, are entitled to receive remuneration from the levy. This article examines whether the operation of the private copying levy in relation to foreign performers and sound recording makers is consistent with the requirement of 'national treatment' pursuant to Canada's international copyright obligations, current and future. The article concludes that a very strong argument can be made that the private copying levy regime is not in compliance with Canada's national treatment obligations as they currently exist under the Rome Convention and the TRIPS Agreement, and as they will exist in the future once Canada ratifies the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25 Keywords: Canada, private copying, levy, international treaty JEL Classification: K11, K33 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 17, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.484 seconds