Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=981306
 
 

Footnotes (121)



 


 



Sex, Trust, and Corporate Boards


Joan MacLeod Heminway


University of Tennessee College of Law


Hastings Women's Law Journal, Vol. 18, p. 173, 2007

Abstract:     
This article collects and interprets social science research on sex and trust and uses this work to shed new light on the emerging case for gender diversity on corporate boards. Specifically, the article describes social science research findings indicating (1) that men and women trust and are trustworthy on different bases and (2) that there is a bias against women in chief executive officer (and potentially other corporate leadership) positions. Based on this research, the nature of corporate management and control, and current legal scholarship on corporate governance, the article asserts that gender diversity on corporate boards may be desirable but difficult to attain. Ultimately, the article calls for more targeted research on the links among sex, trusting behavior, trustworthiness, and corporate board membership and also recommends that boards of directors pursue gender diversification in filling vacancies and new board slots as a means of diversifying trust in the corporation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: trust, trustworthiness, sex, gender, board, directors, independence, diversity, bias, corporate governance

JEL Classification: D60, D63, D64, D69,D70,D78,G30,G34,J70,J71,K22,M10

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 19, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Heminway, Joan MacLeod, Sex, Trust, and Corporate Boards. Hastings Women's Law Journal, Vol. 18, p. 173, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=981306

Contact Information

Joan MacLeod Heminway (Contact Author)
University of Tennessee College of Law ( email )
1505 West Cumberland Avenue
Knoxville, TN 37996
United States
865-974-3813 (Phone)
865-974-0681 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,280
Downloads: 269
Download Rank: 24,448
Footnotes:  121
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds