Abstract

 
 

References (17)



 


 



Capital Budgeting: NPV v. IRR Controversy, Unmasking Common Assertions


Jan F. Jacobs


JBA-Databank

April 19, 2007


Abstract:     
The conflict between NPV and IRR arises because of misinterpretations that have been made. There is no real conflict. The solution of a polynomial is the subject matter: no more, no less. The NPV-method and the IRR-method are not two measures of investment worth - as it is reported in many textbooks - but just one single method. Moreover, the NPV/IRR-method is plain mathematics and does not pretend to be a ranking device; it cannot be used as such either. Mathematics is yes indeed a tool, but economics can only then be the master if the tool is used properly and the results are interpreted correctly. To help assess the very basics of reckoning investment opportunities as well as to improve the current pedagogy - the latter is so dearly necessary - are the two reasons for writing and publishing this paper.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: Capital Budgeting, Measures of Investment Worth, NPV, IRR, Investment Opportunities, Ranking Investment Proposals, Reinvestment Assumption

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 23, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Jacobs, Jan F., Capital Budgeting: NPV v. IRR Controversy, Unmasking Common Assertions (April 19, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=981382 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.981382

Contact Information

Jan F. Jacobs (Contact Author)
JBA-Databank ( email )
Beethovenlaan 36
Enschede, Overijssel 7522 HJ
Netherlands
HOME PAGE: http://www.periodprofitmeasurement.com
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 8,841
Downloads: 1,426
Download Rank: 5,100
References:  17

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 1.031 seconds