Footnotes (30)



Rights, Duties, Liabilities, and Hohfeld

Andrew Halpin

National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Law

Legal Theory, Forthcoming

This essay engages with Jaffey's recent contribution to Legal Theory on the nature of no-prior-duty remedial obligations. Jaffey's use of a right-liability relation and his challenge to Hohfeld's analytical scheme are rejected as unsound. An alternative model distinguishing three pathways to account for remedial obligations and other legal consequences is proposed. This draws on the Hohfeldian scheme but extends it to permit the full expression of reflexive liabilities, mutually correlative liabilities, and the operation of non-human conditions. The proposed approach also recognises a weaker form of a Hohfeldian power, which is required in considering the way that the law deals with the allocation and realisation of risk. It is mentioned in passing that the analytical discussion within the essay may have implications for the law of tort, restitution, and how particular conceptions of property are established in society.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: Hohfeld, Jaffey, liability, power, remedial obligation, risk, negligence, restitution, property

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 26, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Halpin, Andrew, Rights, Duties, Liabilities, and Hohfeld. Legal Theory, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=982001

Contact Information

Andrew Halpin (Contact Author)
National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Law ( email )
469G Bukit Timah Road
Eu Tong Sen Building
Singapore, 259776

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,248
Downloads: 474
Download Rank: 42,251
Footnotes:  30

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds