Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=982400
 


 



Jones v. Flowers: An Essay on a Unified Theory of Procedural Due Process


Patrick Joseph Borchers


Creighton University School of Law


Creighton Law Review, Vol. 40, p. 343, 2007

Abstract:     
Procedural due process has always been seen as having at least three independent strands. One is the jurisdictional or minimum contacts strand. That strand, derived from the Supreme Court's decision in International Shoe Co. v. Washington, requires that a defendant in a civil case have at least a minimal connection to a state before he can be forced to defend an action there. Another is the fair procedures or administrative due process strand. That strand, emanating principally from the Supreme Court's Mathews v. Eldridge decision, requires that for additional procedures to be mandated that they must be cost-justified relative to the private party's interest and the increased accuracy of the resolution of the case. Finally, there is the fair notice strand to which the Supreme Court's 2006 decision in Jones v. Flowers is addressed. The Jones decision actually imports some of the cost-benefit analysis of the fair procedures strand. Moreover, the reasonableness component of the jurisdictional due process strand can be recast along the same lines. Thus, it may be possible to have a coherent and unified theory of procedural due process.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: jurisdiction, due process, civil procedure, cost-benefit, notice

JEL Classification: A12, K00, K41, K30, K39

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 26, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Borchers, Patrick Joseph, Jones v. Flowers: An Essay on a Unified Theory of Procedural Due Process. Creighton Law Review, Vol. 40, p. 343, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=982400

Contact Information

Patrick Joseph Borchers (Contact Author)
Creighton University School of Law ( email )
2500 California Plaza
Omaha, NE 68178
United States
402-280-2874 (Phone)
402-280-3161 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://culaw2.creighton.edu
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 819
Downloads: 129
Download Rank: 129,728

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.265 seconds