Consumer Contracts: Behavioral Economics vs. Neoclassical Economics
Harvard Law School
Richard A. Epstein
New York University School of Law; Stanford University - Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace; University of Chicago - Law School
NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 07-17
Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 92, 2007-2008
In the past decade behavioral economics has established itself as a contender to the throne of neoclassical economics in the economic analysis of law. The pros and cons of behavioral as compared to neoclassical economics have been vigorously debated at the general, methodology level. But the success or failure of the behavioral challenge will be judged by its ability to improve upon neoclassical economics - both descriptively and prescriptively - in specific legal applications. Consumer contracts provide an important test case for behavioral economics. In this exchange we offer the first comprehensive debate between the behavioral and neoclassical perspectives as applied to the law and economics of consumer contracts.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 62
Date posted: April 25, 2007
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.437 seconds