Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=982853
 
 

Footnotes (113)



 


 



Reviving the Right to Vote


Ellen D. Katz


University of Michigan Law School

April 2007

U of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 80

Abstract:     
Losers in partisan districting battles have long challenged the resulting districting plans under seemingly unrelated legal doctrines. They have filed lawsuits alleging malapportionment, racial gerrymandering, and racial vote dilution, and they periodically prevail. Many election law scholars worry about these lawsuits, claiming that they needlessly "racialize" fundamentally political disputes, distort important legal doctrines designed for other purposes, and provide an inadequate remedy for a fundamentally distinct electoral problem.

This Essay argues that the application of distinct doctrines to invalidate or diminish what are indisputably partisan gerrymanders is not necessarily problematic, and that the practice may well have salutary effects. The focus is on the Supreme Court's recent decision in LULAC v. Perry, the most recent example of the sort of judicial decision about which election law scholars fret. Unable to articulate any constitutional problem with a blatant partisan gerrymander in Texas, the Supreme Court found traction under the Voting Rights Act and held that a portion of that gerrymander diluted minority voting strength in the southwest portion of the State. A close reading of that holding as well as the Court's refusal to provide relief on a related claim brought by African-American voters in Fort Worth reveals that the race-based injuries presented in LULAC were hardly an ancillary distraction obscuring the core dispute, but instead, a predictable consequence of the gerrymander itself. As important, the surprising manner in which the Court resolved the VRA claims suggests a nascent conception of political harm experienced by all voters when system is rigged to block competition. In other words, LULAC suggests that Justice Kennedy may find within the Voting Rights Act itself the standard he has been seeking for managing claims of partisan gerrymandering.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: partisan gerrymandering, Voting Rights Act, competition, racial vote dilution, Roberts Court

JEL Classification: D72, H70, J70, J71, J78, K41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 30, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Katz, Ellen D., Reviving the Right to Vote (April 2007). U of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 80. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=982853 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.982853

Contact Information

Ellen Katz (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
LR 960
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
734-647-6241 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,160
Downloads: 279
Download Rank: 59,193
Footnotes:  113

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds