Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (32)



 


 



After Natural Law: A Hermeneutic Response to Law's Quandary


Francis Joseph Mootz III


University of the Pacific - McGeorge School of Law

May 1, 2007


Abstract:     
Law is a practice that claims to be aligning itself with objective truth: "The Law." Natural law theories justified this state of affairs for centuries, but in the wake of the collapse of traditional natural law theories there appears to be no ontological account of law that does credit to the depth of the practice. In particular, legal positivism has failed to fulfill its promise to provide guidance after the eclipse of natural law.

Using Steven Smith's, "Law's Quandary," as a touchstone, I will account for the ontology of law in a naturalistic manner, but without relapsing to traditional natural law accounts. I draw guidance from contemporary theories of rhetoric and hermeneutics, and conclude that law's quandary is really life's quandary, but that we can account for the quandary in satisfactory and productive ways.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: Natural law, Hermeneutics, Rhetoric, Steven Smith, Law's Quandary, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Chaim Perelman, Aristotle, Rhetorical Knowledge

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 2, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Mootz, Francis Joseph, After Natural Law: A Hermeneutic Response to Law's Quandary (May 1, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=983589 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.983589

Contact Information

Francis Joseph Mootz III (Contact Author)
University of the Pacific - McGeorge School of Law ( email )
3200 Fifth Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95817
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 887
Downloads: 236
Download Rank: 62,975
Footnotes:  32

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.797 seconds