Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=983946
 
 

Citations (8)



 
 

Footnotes (219)



 


 



Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication


Jaya Ramji-Nogales


Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law

Andrew Schoenholtz


Georgetown University Law Center

Philip G. Schrag


Georgetown University - Law Center


Stanford Law Review, Vol. 60, 2008
Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2007-12

Abstract:     
This study analyzes databases of merits decisions from all four levels of the asylum adjudication process: 133,000 decisions by 884 asylum officers over a seven year period; 140,000 decisions of 225 immigration judges over a four-and-a-half year period; 126,000 decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals over six years; and 4215 decisions of the U.S. Courts of Appeal during 2004 and 2005. The analysis reveals significant disparities in grant rates, even when different adjudicators in the same office each considered large numbers of applications from nationals of the same country. In many cases, the most important moment in an asylum case is the instant in which a clerk randomly assigns an application to a particular asylum officer or immigration judge.

Using cross-tabulations based on public biographies, the paper also explores correlations between sociological characteristics of individual immigration judges and their grant rates. The cross tabulations show that the chance of winning asylum was strongly affected by whether or not the applicant had legal representation, by the gender of the immigration judge, and by the immigration judge's work experience prior to appointment.

In their conclusion, the authors do not recommend enforced quota systems for asylum adjudicators, but they do make recommendations for more comprehensive training, more effective and independent appellate review, and other reforms that would further professionalize the adjudication system.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 119

Keywords: immigration law, asylum law, refugee, consistency, asylum office, immigration court, Executive Office of Immigration Review, Board of Immigration Appeals, judicial decision-making

JEL Classification: K39

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 31, 2007 ; Last revised: January 3, 2008

Suggested Citation

Ramji-Nogales, Jaya and Schoenholtz, Andrew and Schrag, Philip G., Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication. Stanford Law Review, Vol. 60, 2008; Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2007-12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=983946

Contact Information

Jaya Ramji-Nogales (Contact Author)
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law ( email )
1719 N. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States
215-204-6430 (Phone)
215-204-1185 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.temple.edu/servlet/RetrievePage?site=TempleLaw&page=Faculty_Nogales
Andrew Schoenholtz
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Philip G. Schrag
Georgetown University - Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202 662 9099 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 15,372
Downloads: 3,240
Download Rank: 1,386
Citations:  8
Footnotes:  219

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds