Walling Claims In or Out: Misappropriation of Human Gametic Material and the Tort of Conversion
Judith D. Fischer
University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law
Texas Journal of Women and the Law, Vol. 8, p. 143, 1999
This article discusses fraudulent consent to sexual intercourse as a defense to paying child support. In two separate cases, men had intercourse with women they were not married to. The women bore babies as a result and then sought child support payments from the fathers. The men said that the women had fraudulently obtained consent to intercourse by falsely representing that they were using birth control. Therefore, the men argued, the women were liable for "conversion" of their semen, and the men should be excused from paying child support. The article concludes that, even if the men have viable claims for conversion, public policy prevents a waiver of child support payments as damages.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: Conversion, human reproduction, eggs, semen, embryo, zygote, gamete, ovum, preembryo, genetic, sperm, fertility clinic, child support, birth control, consent, quasi-property, property, cells, conversion, IVF, in vitro, fertilization, Moore v. Regents of the University of California
JEL Classification: K10Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 9, 2007
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.484 seconds