Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=984899
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (239)



 


 



The (Not So) Puzzling Behavior of Angel Investors


Darian M. Ibrahim


William & Mary Law School


Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 61, p. 1405, 2008
Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 07-16

Abstract:     
Angel investors fund start-ups in their earliest stages, which creates a contracting environment rife with uncertainty, information asymmetry, and agency costs in the form of potential opportunism by entrepreneurs. Venture capitalists also encounter these problems in slightly later-stage funding, and use a combination of staged financing, preferred stock, board seats, negative covenants, and specific exit rights to respond to them. Curiously, however, traditional angel investment contracts employ none of these measures, which appears inconsistent with what financial contracting theory would predict. This article explains this (not so) puzzling behavior on the part of angel investors, and also explains the recent move toward venture capital-like contracts as angel investing becomes more of a professional endeavor.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: Angel Investor, Venture Capital, Financial Contracting, Incomplete Contracting, Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial Finance, Start-up, Agency Costs, Information Asymmetry

JEL Classification: D80, D81, D82, G24, G32, K12, K20, K22, M13

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 7, 2007 ; Last revised: March 26, 2009

Suggested Citation

Ibrahim, Darian M., The (Not So) Puzzling Behavior of Angel Investors. Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 61, p. 1405, 2008; Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 07-16. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=984899

Contact Information

Darian M. Ibrahim (Contact Author)
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,149
Downloads: 914
Download Rank: 13,399
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  239
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.765 seconds