Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=984915
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (305)



 


 



Dispatches from the Tort Wars: A Review Essay


Anthony J. Sebok


Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law


Texas Law Review, Vol. 85, 2007
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 76

Abstract:     
It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that, as a political matter, the modern tort reform movement has been very successful. This essay reviews three books that either rebut the tort reform movement's central theses or analyze the strategies that allowed the movement to prevail. I discuss Tom Baker's The Medical Malpractice Myth, Herbert Kritzer's Risks, Reputations, and Rewards: Contingency Fee Legal Practice in the United States, and William Haltom & Michael McCann's Distorting the Law: Politics, Media, and the Litigation Crisis. Although each book has a very different focus from the other two, I argue that a common theme which runs through all three books is that the tort reformers' success relies on promoting myths about how plaintiff's lawyers put their own interests above those of their clients and reject the political culture of individualism that forms the bedrock of American civil society. While I do not want to deny that there is a need for a rebuttal of this part of tort reformers' worldview, I argue that rebutting it has limited value to those who want to defend the current tort system. I argue that an exclusive focus on the myths that the tort reformers have told leaves unanswered other critiques of the current tort system which cannot be so easily dismissed. For example, the tort reformers, as well as others, have noted that the tort system dramatically expanded and changed in the 1960's and 1970's, and that this expansion was often based on academic and political arguments that celebrated the tort system's ability to perform certain functions beyond private redress for wrongs, such as cost-spreading or providing regulation in the face of legislative inaction. By failing to recognize these possible criticisms, the authors of the three books, I argue, leave the hardest battles for another day.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: tort law, tort reform, politics, media, liability

JEL Classification: K13, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 10, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Sebok, Anthony J., Dispatches from the Tort Wars: A Review Essay. Texas Law Review, Vol. 85, 2007; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 76. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=984915

Contact Information

Anthony J. Sebok (Contact Author)
Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,287
Downloads: 238
Download Rank: 73,271
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  305

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.204 seconds