Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=984981
 


 



Pleasing the Court: Writing Ethical and Effective Briefs


Judith D. Fischer


University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law


PLEASING THE COURT: WRITING ETHICAL AND EFFECTIVE BRIEFS, Carolina Academic Press, 2005

Abstract:     
This book examines professionalism in legal writing by analyzing more than two hundred examples of judges' reactions to lawyers' errors. Serious ethical breaches are examined, including misrepresentions of the law or the facts, plagiarism, and lack of civility. Wordiness, lack of clarity, and grammatical and citation errors are also covered. The erring attorneys incurred consequences ranging from disbarment to strong verbal rebukes.

The book promotes high standards in brief writing. It also demonstrates that the U.S. legal system includes restraints on incompetent lawyering and the filing of frivolous lawsuits.

Keywords: Lawyer, attorney, court, errors, unprofessionalism, legal writing, brief, research, misrepresentation, organization, clarity, wordiness, verbosity, legalese, court rules, grammar, spelling, punctuation, citation, civility, plagiarism, bar discipline, suspension, Rule 11, sanctions, judges

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: May 10, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Fischer, Judith D., Pleasing the Court: Writing Ethical and Effective Briefs. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=984981

Contact Information

Judith D. Fischer (Contact Author)
University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law ( email )
Wilson W. Wyatt Hall
Louisville, KY 40292
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 433

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.312 seconds