Abstract

 
 

References (24)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Robust Performance Hypothesis Testing with the Sharpe Ratio


Michael Wolf


University of Zurich - Department of Economics Library; University of Zurich - Department of Eonomics

May 2007

ZEW - Center for European Economic Research Paper No. 320

Abstract:     
Applied researchers often test for the difference of the Sharpe ratios of two investment strategies. A very popular tool to this end is the test of Jobson and Korkie (1981), which has been corrected by Memmel (2003). Unfortunately, this test is not valid when returns have tails heavier than the normal distribution or are of time series nature. Instead, we propose the use of robust inference methods. In particular, we suggest to construct a studentized time series bootstrap confidence interval for the difference of the Sharpe ratios and to declare the two ratios different if zero is not contained in the obtained interval. This approach has the advantage that one can simply resample from the observed data as opposed to some null-restricted data. A simulation study demonstrates the improved finite sample performance compared to existing methods. In addition, two applications to real data are provided.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: Bootstrap, HAC inference, Sharpe ratio

JEL Classification: C12, C14, C22

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 14, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Wolf, Michael, Robust Performance Hypothesis Testing with the Sharpe Ratio (May 2007). ZEW - Center for European Economic Research Paper No. 320. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=985038 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.985038

Contact Information

Michael Wolf (Contact Author)
University of Zurich - Department of Economics Library ( email )
Rämistrasse 71
Zurich, 8006
Switzerland
University of Zurich - Department of Eonomics ( email )
Wilfriedstrasse 6
Zurich, CH-8032
Switzerland
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,294
Downloads: 404
Download Rank: 33,641
References:  24
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.969 seconds