Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=985374
 
 

Footnotes (19)



 


 



Examining the FCC's Complaint-Driven Broadcast Indecency Enforcement Process


Adam D. Thierer


George Mason University - Mercatus Center

November 9, 2005

Progress & Freedom Foundation Progress on Point Paper No. 12.22

Abstract:     
The FCC in recent years has increased its fines for broadcast indecency and has cited rising complaints as a reason. However, upwards of 99% of the broadcast indecency complaints received by the FCC have come from campaigns generated by a single advocacy group. Moreover these totals have been inflated by two recent changes in methodology by the agency, changes not made to other complaints received on topics as disparate as cable rates and spectrum interference.

In so doing, it permits a process whereby indecency complaints appear to be artificially inflated relative to other types of complaints. Journalists, policy makers, social scientists, and others should weigh this disparate treatment when considering the significance of the reported figures.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

Keywords: Federal Communications Commission, FCC, Broadcast Indecency, broadcast content, indecency complaints, Parents Television Council, PTC, broadcast regulation, wardrobe malfunction, broadcast programming, indecency fines, FCC complaints, indecency complaints, censorship, media regulation, indecency

JEL Classification: D18, L82, L5, L50, L59, O38

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 10, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Thierer, Adam D., Examining the FCC's Complaint-Driven Broadcast Indecency Enforcement Process (November 9, 2005). Progress & Freedom Foundation Progress on Point Paper No. 12.22. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=985374 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.985374

Contact Information

Adam D. Thierer (Contact Author)
George Mason University - Mercatus Center ( email )
3351 Fairfax Drive
4th Floor
Arlington, VA 22201-4433
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 497
Downloads: 52
Download Rank: 227,144
Footnotes:  19

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 1.141 seconds