The Economics of International Labor Migration and the Case for Global Distributive Justice in Liberal Political Theory
Howard F. Chang
University of Pennsylvania Law School
Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 41, p. 1, 2008
U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 07-08
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 07-21
Estimates of the magnitude of the gains that the world could enjoy by liberalizing international migration indicate that even partial liberalization would not only produce substantial increases in the world's real income but also improve its distribution. Although the economic effects of immigration on native workers and distributive justice among natives are often advanced as reasons to reduce immigration, these concerns do not provide a sound justification for our restrictive immigration laws. Instead, the appropriate response to concerns about the distribution of income among natives is to increase the progressivity of our tax system. Protectionist immigration policies are not only likely to be relatively costly as an instrument for redistribution but also perverse from the standpoint of global justice. I argue that liberal ideals require a global view of distributive justice and that recent attempts by some liberal theorists and philosophers to defend more limited conceptions of distributive justice that apply only within nations are all ultimately question-begging. Thus, I conclude that considerations of both economic efficiency and distributive justice militate in favor of liberalized immigration policies.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25
Keywords: Law & Economics, Law & Philosophy, Jurisprudence, Law & Social Sciences, Law & the Global Community, Immigration Law, Moral & Political Philosophy, Economics
JEL Classification: F22, J61, KAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 15, 2007 ; Last revised: September 22, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.391 seconds