|
||||
|
||||
Characteristics, Covariances, and Average Returns: 1929-1997
James L. Davis Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. Eugene F. Fama University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Kenneth R. French Dartmouth College - Tuck School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) February 1999 Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP) Working Paper No. 471 Abstract: The value premium in U.S. stocks returns is robust. The positive relation between average return and book-to-market equity (BE/ME) is as strong for 1929-63 as for the subsequent period studied in previous papers. Like others, we also find a size premium in stock returns. Small stocks have higher average returns than big stocks. The size premium is, however, weaker and less reliable than the value premium. The relations between average return and firm characteristics (size and BE/ME) are better explained by a three-factor risk model than by the behavioral hypothesis that investor overreaction causes characteristics to be compensated irrespective of risk loadings.
JEL Classifications: G12 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: August 12, 1998 ; Last revised: November 05, 2001Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.125 seconds.