SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (94)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

The New Discovery Doctrine: Some Thoughts on Property Rights and Traditional Knowledge

Rebecca Bratspies
City University of New York - CUNY School of Law



American Indian Law Review, 2007

Abstract:     
The discourse surrounding traditional knowledge takes place on a number of levels simultaneously. Trade advocates view ownership of traditional knowledge and biological diversity through the lens of the World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements. Environmentalists approach the question with ecosystem preservation in mind. Because most of the world's remaining biodiversity exists within the territories of indigenous peoples, issues of sovereignty, identity and colonialism inevitably swirl beneath the surface. And, of course, all these dialogues occur against a backdrop of a globalizing market economy that values resources almost exclusively in terms of their monetary value.

So far, the dynamic seems to be a tug of war between two alternative property visions: state ownership of biological resources, as articulated in Article 8j of the Convention on Biological Diversity, and private ownership of these resources under the TRIPS agreement.

There is, however, a third aspectto this struggle over traditional Knowledge and biological resources. Most of the world's remaining biodiversity exists within indigenous lands and territories. Rather than as an aspect of state sovereignty over territory, or the fruits of private invention, indigenous leaders conceive of these resources as an aspect of self-determination - as a recognition of their fundamental rights to property and culture. Indigenous groups are thus trying to expand the discourse over biological resources so that it includes their interests and their hopes for wresting back control over territories, resources and heritage.

Given the resources devoted to developing comprehensive laws to ensure protection of intellectual property one might ask why the current legal system does so little to safeguard the cultural and intellectual property interests of indigenous groups. When the interests and assets of an entire group are, by definition, not embraced within the protective mantle we call property, it ought to prompt exploration of some hard questions. This article attempts to pose some of those questions and to suggest areas for further inquiry.

Keywords: indigenous, traditional knowledge, TRIPS, biodiversity, property

JEL Classifications: K19, K32, K33

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: May 18, 2007 ; Last revised: July 17, 2007

Suggested Citation

Bratspies, Rebecca, The New Discovery Doctrine: Some Thoughts on Property Rights and Traditional Knowledge. American Indian Law Review, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=987042


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Rebecca Bratspies (Contact Author)
City University of New York - CUNY School of Law ( email )
65-21 Main Street
Flushing, NY 11367-1300
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 763
Downloads: 226
Download Rank: 37,633
Footnotes: 94

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.110 seconds.